this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
85 points (83.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2288 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah yes, if the democratic party had tactically shifted candidates at the right time, the US and the world could have continued business as usual for another 50 years.
Definitely. Absolutely!

No reason at all to consider that maybe people are completely fed up with the entire system, which strip-mines the planet's resources and the fruits of the workers' labor, to hand them to a dozen ghouls at the top.

And lacking literally ANY sane option for change, they chose an insane one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How is Trump the cure for any of that?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He isn't.
He's a collectively shouted "fuck you" to the American political establishment.
He's the result of a system that made peaceful protest toothless and brings the hammer down on anyone trying to enact change through direct action.
His voters used the only means they have to slap the political old guard (of both parties) in the face, and enjoy their desperation for a while. They didn't feel like they had much to lose anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes, I feel I can no longer peacefully protest so I think I’ll just standby and do nothing so a guy who thinks protesters should be shot or deported can take the reins. That’ll show ‘em!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

I don't know if you noticed, but electing Trump wasn't a measured, logical, sensible decision.
Criticising how Trump's policies don't improve his voters' outlook is already missing the point entirely.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He isn't, but if you want something different from the same establishment bullshit that we've had for decades, he's the only option.

If you're on the right, you have the populist/fascist asshole you've always wanted.

If you're on the left, you either vote for neoliberalism to protect yourself from fascism, or you don't vote at all.

This time around, the left chose the latter. We're fucking tired, and it's the Dems that wore us out by never listening to a single fucking thing we asked for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

“I got tired of the system so I decided to let it burn down and take the lives of millions with it”

See Ukraine

See Gaza

See promises of mass deportation

But yes, you’re justified in your non participation because you didn’t actively vote for him, you just enabled his people to hand the control to a madman because you got tired of trying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

OP isn't talking about himself. He's talking about why so many libs sat it out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This is it. Democrats will continue to talk about how they failed at execution so they don't have to talk about the real problem: their platform. At least with Trump some folks think there's a chance he shakes apart the whole system.

I voted for Harris, but I knew it was a lost cause from the moment she became the de facto nominee. She was a status quo candidate in a change election.