this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
27 points (88.6% liked)

Games

16803 readers
531 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pika 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

gamepass ultimate isn't worth the value for me. realistically there is only maybe 3 games a year I really must have wanted to play, and most of them I know will go on sale later on down the road. Paying 240$ a year for a program that I only really am going to play maybe a handful of must play games on isn't worth it.

The issue isn't the selection of games on the platform, they have a ton. It is just cost wise, why pay 240$ a year for it, and get a handful of games I can only play while they sub is active, when most games I play are in the 20-40$ range anyway and if I just buy them it's a once off can play forever purchase. I can't even give them the argument of convenience, because it's equal to 4 AAA titles yearly, that you need to keep paying for in order to continue to use.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

I share my console with my son and at the moment it makes sense for the two of us.

If we split onto seperate consoles as he gets older I don't see myself paying for two subscriptions.

[–] Pika 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

yea I think if I shared a sub cost with someone it would be worth it, it's the only reason i still have prime. I personally think that $120 for service rendered is a little low, but I believe that $240 is just too steep for a single person. For the benefits given, I think easily $5 a month for online, then like $7 or $8 a month for the games would be more then reasonable instead of the current $20 a month. I think 150-160 a year is more than fair for service rendered, but currently its roughly $15 a month for just the games(assuming the previous price of 60/year for only online which ends up being $5 a month), that's almost a full indy game title monthly. Unless I'm actively playing more then 10 Indy games a year, or more than 4 AAA titles, it's just not worth having for the current price. It's usually cheaper to just buy the game outright

that being said, if PC game pass is what MS considers it's Ultimate without online sub... they consider just the game portion as $12 a month, which for what is offered, I find too steep for my tastes for someone who would want to lock on for a year at a time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

It was worth it when you had the surprise hits coming in. Things like, a rhythm-based combat game about a corrupt corporation.