this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
29 points (74.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8664 readers
430 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Dunn acknowledges that he could have found the same answer with the right Google search terms, but says that the point is that he didn't have to: ChatGPT immediately returned what he was looking for even though he described it vaguely.

I remember when google used to return the right results even when the search was vague.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Its so stupid, google "bipartie matching algorithm" and the second result is a stack overflow where the second answer is the Hungarian algorithm....

So every programmer would have found that immediately using the traditional methodology....

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yup, AI is frequently a worse way to do something we used to do, but with a crappy pretend to be a person responding veneer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not what I got. In fact, stack overflow isn't in any of my results. I got a lot of scholarly articles for various algorithms and none of them mention the Hungarian algorithm.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Same lol. Its incredible how shit it’s been made.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Right? I was thinking that exactly. I remember being in awe by how well google could do that, and now I actually dread having to use it and sift through all the crap.

I guess the same will happen to "AI" once they try to monetize it with ads.