Danger Dust

234 readers

2 users here now

A community for those occupationally exposed to dusts, toxins, pollutants, hazardous materials or noxious environments

Dangerous Dusts , Fibres, Toxins, Pollutants, Occupational Hazards, Stonemasonry, Construction News and Environmental Issues

#Occupational Diseases

#Autoimmune Diseases

#Silicosis

#Cancer

#COPD

#Chronic Fatigue

#Hazardous Materials

#Kidney Disease

#Pneumoconiosis

#The Environment

#Pollutants

#Pesticides

and more

Please be nice to each other and follow the rules : []https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Scientists reviewed 7,000 studies on microplastics. Their alarming conclusion puts humanity on notice (theconversation.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In short, microplastics are widespread, accumulating in the remotest parts of our planet. There is evidence of their toxic effects at every level of biological organisation, from tiny insects at the bottom of the food chain to apex predators.

Microplastics are pervasive in food and drink and have been detected throughout the human body. Evidence of their harmful effects is emerging.

The scientific evidence is now more than sufficient: collective global action is urgently needed to tackle microplastics – and the problem has never been more pressing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Read the actual paper:

Microplastics have been detected in more than 1300 aquatic and terrestrial species, including fish, mammals, birds and insects (Fig. 3) (23, 58, 63) and effects are evident at all levels of biological organization, from the subcellular level to the stability of food webs (64–66). Ingestion can lead to physical harm, such as food dilution, gastrointestinal blockage, or internal abrasion (65, 66), and chemical harm, due to the leaching of toxic additives or adsorbed pollutants, including endocrine disrupting chemicals, from the microplastics (67, 68).

The absorption of the smallest particles by the body can lead to toxicity triggered upon translocation (69), for which surface area of the microplastic is considered the toxicologically relevant dose metric (70). Effects vary widely according to the organism and the type and quantity of microplastics ingested, but endpoints with direct ecological relevance including reduced growth, survival, and reproduction have all been demonstrated in laboratory experiments.

Whether the particles and chemical substances show effects under natural exposure conditions strongly depends on the circumstances (71–73) but effects at environmentally relevant concentration have been demonstrated (74).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If they are saying gastrointestinal blockage is an effect of microplastics, I’m really worried about their methodology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh well I guess we should trust your opinion on this instead of the scientists, since you apparently didn't even read this review article or its sources but already know more than them.

Scientists: "We have overwhelming evidence of how microplastics are negatively affecting life and ecosystems all over the world."

You: "But how does that affect me? I'm not being choked by microplastics."