this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
67 points (94.7% liked)
Not The Onion
13678 readers
564 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I keep vacillating on whether this makes any damn sense.
Here's the ISS transiting the moon, or possibly some lost footage from A New Hope. Just measuring that JPG, the moon's about 600px in diameter and the ISS is charitably 100 pixels, so it's like 1/3000th the scale, from Earth's perspective. Well - the moon is 400,000 times fainter than the sun.
The sun and the moon are roughly the same size, from Earth's perspective. So there's some arrangement where, from any point you can see an ISS-sized mirror in front of the moon, it'd be reflecting the sun. The moon's about a thousand times further from Earth than the ISS, and has a diameter of 3400 km, so if you draw those two triangles touching at the ISS, the lit-up area on Earth should be about 3.4 km in diameter.
It'd be one hundred times brighter than the full moon, but still one thousand times dimmer than daylight.
Huh.