this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
464 points (96.0% liked)
Greentext
4500 readers
1191 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How? I would like to entertain myself with their reasons.
The usual "can't get out if you're trapped, the seatbelt causes more injuries in smaller crashes, I knew a guy who got whiplash cause the seatbelt threw him against his seat"
I've tried explaining it multiple times but I quit trying because it's exhausting ๐ฎโ๐จ
lmao, I would just say "shoulda worn a helmet".
There are a handful of situations where the seatbelt kills you. It's a sad reality, but the seatbelt isn't a perfect tool.
The problem is that people don't understand the idea of harm reduction.
The odds of getting injured or killed in any severity of accident goes up without a seatbelt. Even slamming your breaks becomes more dangerous if you're not strapped in. People have been killed in cars, without impact, because they weren't wearing a seatbelt during some sort of high-velocity maneuver.
The few cases of strangulation, or getting trapped in a burning vehicle because you couldn't reach the buckle, are so rare, and there's no way to measure actual lives saved, people don't properly calculate the risk.
But I think some people just don't like being told what to do and will be obstinate about things like safety requirements...
Yeah, a good example is how the injury rate skyrocketed when seatbelts were introduced. Anti-seatbelt people (yes, they exist just like antivaxxers and anti maskers do today) used this to point out that seatbelts were harmful.
Injury rates skyrocketed because fatality rates plummeted. People who would have died were now only injured. But the anti-seatbelters conveniently ignored that second half of the statistic, and only looked at the increased injury rates.
Seatbelts do cause injury (bruising, hematoma, etc) with hard impact but itโs usually a better outcome than being ejected from the vehicle and then having brains ejected from your skull..