this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
6 points (53.4% liked)

World News

32372 readers
519 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

A prolonged incursion into Russia could escalate the conflict, drawing in other nations and potentially leading to a catastrophic global confrontation.

Bit of a joke to write this, isn't it. The one country that is escalating things is Russia. They could have always moved back and have given up and this would all be over. Maybe Ukraine would leave the Russian territory if Russia leaves Ukrainian territory? Not sure that's on the table.

Edit: coming back to all the reactions. Just wow, hilarious.

Edit2: haha, they even come back to monitor edits. Fun times.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (12 children)

They could have always moved back and have given up and this would all be over.

Ukraine could surrender at any time and this would all be over smuglord

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

So could Russia, whats your point?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (9 children)

that is the point you mental child, "they could just give up though" is the dumbest shit that anybody's wasted time typing out in this thread

particularly when Ukraine has been losing since Russia invaded in 2022. You get how conflicts work, right? The guys winning never surrender, because they're fucking winning

liberals are so stupid

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

(The point was to illustrate how stupid your comment was)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Since you apparently like Star Trek, here's a video clip describing your situation

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The one country that is escalating things is Russia. They could have always moved back and have given up and this would all be over.

Are you fucking serious

What do you call expanding NATO? You think that isn't escalation because, what, "it's a defensive pact"? You really don't see how a country like Russia could view an encirclement of "defensive" pacts as aggressive, when it has constantly stated that Ukraine joining NATO is a red line?

You don't think NATO discussing sending NUKES TO UKRAINE, putting them within MINUTES OF MOSCOW, is in any way an escalation?

What the FUCK is wrong with you fucking people

NATO could have simply not attempted to expand, Ukraine could have simply honored the Minsk agreement and stopped genociding Russians in the Donbas, but you don't say shit like that, you think it's entirely on Russia. Brainwashed ass motherfucker

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)


[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Russia is so terrified of Nato encroachment that they stripped their defenses along the Finnish boarder shortly after Finland joined Nato, and they've moved all the defenses at this point (first weapons, now troops) out of Kaliningrad.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  1. Invading via Finland isn’t a thing. Ask Bonaparte or Hitler. There’s nothing up there but lakes, mud, and mosquitos.
  2. Where were Russian speakers being killed by government-backed neo-Nazis for the last decade? In eastern Norway? No, in eastern Ukraine.
  3. The US doesn’t have nuclear weapons deployed in Finland, and no known plans to. NATO Ally [Poland] 'Ready' to Station Nuclear Weapons on Its Territory

.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There’s nothing up there but lakes, mud, and mosquitos

That's a rude way to describe Saint Petersburg.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Is it hard to post on Lemmy from inside a locker?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Saint Petersburg

Where's that? Is it near Leningrad?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Why would the Murican give such assurance to a failing empire? What would the Russians do ? Not collapse ? Kill a bunch of people as they retreat ?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Edit: coming back to all the reactions. Just wow, hilarious.

It's okay to admit you're incapable of grappling with reality and prefer to stay inside your NATO mind palace

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The one country that is escalating things is Russia.

This war is literally only happening because of the US and the other countries in NATO. Don't think you should be writing such pithy statements if your understanding of the war is equivalent to a Star Wars plotline.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least in Star Wars they explain the context with the scroll at the start of the movie, libs think that Ukraine literally popped into existence in 2022.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

They don't even remember what Trump's first impeachment was about

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

They're out there watching you 👀

[–] Atomic -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a .ml community. What did you expect?

[–] snugglesthefalse -1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Yeah I'm on the verge of blocking ml as well as hexbear, it's insane the level of mental gymnastics that's happening. Like what do they think Russia is going to do any less damage to the world than America if they get the chance?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

do they think Russia is going to do any less damage to the world than America if they get the chance

Very probably, yes.

Around 20 years ago Russia—at the time lead by Putin—wanted to join the imperialism club, but the US rejected them. Ex-Nato head says Putin wanted to join alliance early on in his rule. Since then Russia, rejected by the Global North, has had no choice but to join with the Global South as allies instead of neocolonizers. Hence BRICS+ and the larger developing multipolar bloc that’s going its own way, ignoring the US’ “rules-based international order” sanctions, developing its own international balance of payments outside of US dollar hegemony, and working to get out from under the boot of the IMF’s & World Bank’s debt traps.

Why did the US reject Russia from joining NATO? Because the US doesn’t want Europe and Russia to develop closer ties, because it doesn’t want the “Eurasian landmass” to ever cohere, because then it would become too self-sufficient and powerful for the US to control. Zbigniew Brzezinski laid this theory out when the Soviet Union fell. That’s why the US tried to convince Europe not to build Nord Stream 2 and then later not to turn it on, why Biden said he would “bring an end to it” if Russia invaded, and why they ultimately did bring an end to it.

The US also very much wants regime change or balkanization in Russia so it can resume its neocolonial “shock therapy” plundering of it, which started under Yeltsin and ended under Putin. That’s why the US has a special hate-on for Putin.

Compare what Russia has done in the last 80 years to the US:

As for the US’ actions against post-Soviet Russia in particular:
The US has wanted to break up or otherwise weaken/isolate Russia ever since almost immediately after the break-up of the USSR. That’s why it’s been expanding NATO ever-closer to Russia despite originally having sworn up & down never to move one inch eastward. The US couldn’t allow a Ukrainian government to stand that was friendly with Russia. That’s why it couped Ukraine’s government in 2014.

load more comments (5 replies)