this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1242 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12786 readers
3532 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You remember being in the womb then? Or being a sperm? Those move, you know.

Bacteria move, but I don't think you can argue they have minds capable of suffering. Your body would be doing a lot of murder every second of every day in that case. What about insects? Do you consider ants and mosquitos conscious? Should they be protected by animal rights laws?

For a lot of the duration of a pregnancy, a fetus is not composed of enough cells to be much different.

The body autonomy, let alone the health of a woman should not be compromised to "protect" a life that isn't a life yet.

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't remember being 1 or 2 years old. You saying it's okay to murder me as long as I don't remember it when I'm older or something? ๐Ÿคฃ

The difference between a foetus and bacteria or ants, is that a foetus is human. Bacteria and ants aren't. I cannot believe we've stooped to this level of immorality.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You saying it's okay to murder me as long as I don't remember it when I'm older or something?

One could make that point, but no.

Infanticide being a crime does not compromise the body autonomy or health of another conscious human. Criminalizing abortion, does.

The difference between a foetus and bacteria or ants, is that a foetus is human. Bacteria and ants aren't.

This is a false distinction. Why is human life more important than other life? What elevates a small collection of human cells above an equivalent number of insect cells?

I cannot believe we've stooped to this level of immorality.

I could say the same. This sentence serves no purpose, and will convince absolutely no-one that your sense of ethics is more developed than mine.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Abortion isn't "bodily autonomy" Your body doesn't automatically have a miscarriage on a whim. It's inserting an instrument into a woman's body and destroying another person who's in there. Human life is more valuable than human life. We literally eat animals. Again, the fact I have to explain to someone that killing another person because you don't want to face up to the consequences of your actions, and no, killing a person isn't the same as killing an animal, shows how far we've regressed.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You have no idea what you're talking about.

A collection of sells that may or may not even have formed neurons yet, is not a person

consequences of your actions

And there it is. You want women to be punished for the crime of having sex. Or being raped. Or having a condom break. Whatever.

You're a misogynist asshole with no argument.

Human life is more valuable than human life.

I think you meant to claim that undeveloped fetuses have more rights than women.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Also, look up what body autonomy means. It doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.