this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
43 points (92.2% liked)

Economics

452 readers
23 users here now

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (7 children)

The issue here is it’s hitting the tier of people who are just able to get in on a house purchase. Only to have that price raised on them after purchase, through taxes. Especially irksome when it’s known they’ve overpaid just to get a place to land. Will the taxes go down if they sell for less? Probably not.

More squeeze on the little guy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Mansion Taxes Could Generate Billions Nationally Each Year

States with existing mansion taxes should increase their rates on the highest-value homes. States without these taxes should enact them, with rates that get progressively higher as the value of the house goes higher. If every state enacted progressive transfer taxes on high-value homes, billions of dollars could be generated for state budgets across the country. Taxing the top 10 percent, 5 percent, and 1 percent of home sales in every state could generate a total of $8.7 billion annually.[23] (See Figure 3.)

To give a state-specific example, consider a hypothetical proposal that adds a progressive marginal tax to sales of the top 10, 5, and 1 percent of homes in Virginia (meaning homes sold at or above $900,000, $1.1 million, and $1.9 million, respectively.) Applying a marginal tax rate of 2 percent, 3 percent, and 4 percent to each of those thresholds would generate an estimated $128 million annually. If this funding were earmarked for the state’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund, which has received just $18 million since fiscal year 2018, it could increase investment in that fund tenfold in just a single year.[24] Further, since a real estate transfer tax would create an ongoing revenue source, it could be used to fund housing initiatives like rental and operating subsidies that are difficult to finance with one-time state investments.

By the article's explanation, the top 10, 5, and 1 percent are not introductory price levels. These are high-value homes, not starter homes.

[–] entropicshart -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Take a look at homes around cities that actually have career options. Homes that used to cost 400k are now going for over a million.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

And what echelon of sale price do they fall under?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)