Technology

59708 readers

1850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

530

Google Search’s “udm=14” trick lets you kill AI search for good | Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

93 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tack "&udm=14" on to the end of a normal search, and you'll be booted into the clean 10 blue links interface. While Google might not let you set this as a default, if you have a way to automatically edit the Google search URL, you can create your own defaults.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Things like irrelevant results, inaccurate or outdated information, missing or completely incorrect information, or just information that doesn't contextualize the queries properly. For a start. Do you think search engine optimisation is just a google thing or what? Because I have news for you. Seo is a problem for all of the search engines. So are irrelevant results, failure to contextualize queries, and just receiving incorrect or missing information. None of those problems get fixed by switching to duck duck go, or bing or kagi or whatever. Can I avoid the AI LLM BS? Maybe. But having tried alternatives I just don't find them to be particularly better. In some cases, especially for my work I find them to be worse.

Stop saying "alternatives are available". If I search for an AP article using search terms "apnews.com: senator visits Taiwan" I should get news articles from the AP news website. Even if those are from 2014. That's contextually accurate to the search query. I get articles from a fair number of websites and news outlets. I don't want those. Know what I don't get? Articles in chronological order from when they were written, from the AP news website. I don't want anything from twitter or Facebook or Reddit. That's me trying to use a search engine to search a specific website. Same thing happens when I search for a gif on imgur.com using imgur.com: "search query" in the search box.

Years ago I tried to use google and duck duck go and Bing to find information about some nonsense someone at work was spouting about congress attempting to pass a pro child molester bill. Not only could I not find anything relating to where this was being reported and what nonsense they were bastardizing to come to such a ridiculous conclusion, I couldn't even find actual bills relating to things like anti-child molestation legislation. I had to actually search the congress website and then use key words on the website to find what I was looking for.

Try looking for a sort of popular anime from the early 90's that you can't remember the name of. You get a bunch of top ten lists. You get anime that came out well after the time period specified. You get random fanart. You will absolutely not get the anime you're looking for unless it was really really popular. The alternatives all give varying degrees of the same results.