this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
838 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
59581 readers
2916 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well, not necessarily.
Short term, they dramatically increased access to credible fast charging.
Longer term, near as I can tell, third party NACS fast charging will commence. So while this may be a disaster for Tesla and the Tesla charging network per se, long term it has room for another company to come along and displace Tesla.
If such a company were looking for a team to drive such an initiative, it seems we all know where to find one now...
NACS is essentially CCS in a Tesla plug, so the only reason there isn't any yet is that nobody has made the switch yet - any CCS charger could be converted by just swapping the plug.
But it also means passive adapters work and are cheap, so there's no hurry really.
Honestly, EV-Go or Electrify America building NACS chargers isn't going to fix anything. The plug isn't what makes the Supercharger network appealing, it's the fact they ensure the stations are ubiquitous, fully functional, and the payment is seamless. If he's throwing out the team that is making sure those things continue to be true, the charging problem is only going to get worse.