this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
372 points (98.7% liked)

News

23424 readers
2339 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Louisiana man has been sentenced to decades in prison and physical castration after pleading guilty to raping a teenager, according to a news release from the region's district attorney. 

Glenn Sullivan Sr., 54, pled guilty to four counts of second-degree rape on April 17. Authorities began investigating Sullivan in July 2022, when a young woman told the Livingston Parish Sheriff's Office that Sullivan had assaulted her multiple times when she was 14. The assaults resulted in pregnancy, and a DNA test confirmed that Sullivan was the father of the child, the district attorney's office said. Sullivan had also groomed the victim and threatened her and her family to prevent her from coming forward.

A 2008 Louisiana law says that men convicted of certain rape offenses may be sentenced to chemical castration. They can also elect to be physically castrated. Perrilloux said that Sullivan's plea requires he be physically castrated. The process will be carried out by the state's Department of Corrections, according to the law, but cannot be conducted more than a week before a person's prison sentence ends. This means Sullivan wouldn't be castrated until a week before the end of his 50-year sentence — when he would be more than 100 years old.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (20 children)

It's a bad idea. The reason it's a bad idea is the same reason that the death penalty is a bad idea: the US penal system frequently gets it wrong.

[–] QBertReynolds 9 points 7 months ago (18 children)

Not saying you're wrong, but she had a baby at 14 that shares the rapist's DNA. I don't think there's any doubt he did it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (13 children)

She had his child?

Do we know if she was willing during the sexual encounter?

[–] QBertReynolds 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

She was a child. Please fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are you afraid to answer this?

[–] QBertReynolds 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Because it's a sick question. A 14-year-old child can't be "willing during the sexual encounter". It's just rape. If that's not reason enough for you though, here's the relevant bit from the article:

The assaults resulted in pregnancy, and a DNA test confirmed that Sullivan was the father of the child, the district attorney's office said. Sullivan had also groomed the victim and threatened her and her family to prevent her from coming forward.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes they can be.

You're just afraid to answer the question cause it doesn't go along with your agenda.

[–] QBertReynolds 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My agenda of wanting children to have a rape-free childhood? You're disgusting. Fuck off pedophile.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Calm down.

If you didn't want to answer the question, you didn't have to respond.

[–] QBertReynolds 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I did answer your question. I said she can't have consented because she's a child. I also quoted the relevant lines from the article that said she was groomed and threatened. You just didn't like my answer because it didn't fit your agenda of wanting to be allowed rape children.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No you didn't.

You pivoted to consent instead of willingness, which I did not ask.

[–] QBertReynolds 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well let me be perfectly clear then. Children don't willingly have sex with adults. They're coerced, groomed, tricked, conned, manipulated, threatened, or forced. Even if a 14-year-old's brain was developed enough to understand exactly what was happening (and it's absolutely not), the power dynamic between an adult and a child has a profound impact on whatever agency the child had in the situation.

If an adult convinced a child to point a gun at their head and pull the trigger, I guess you could call that willingly committing suicide, but I would call it murder.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Children don’t willingly have sex with adults.

That's not true. I had sex with an 18 year old when I was 14 and I don't regret it for a second.

I think I would be way more messed up in the head if I missed out on my opportunity because of people like you who don't really care about me anyways.

If you really want to get into it, Edgar Allen Poe married his cousin when she was 13.

Maybe she actually wanted to marry him? But you're too far gone to see reality for what it is.

[–] QBertReynolds 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The power dynamic between 14 and 18 is not the same as the one between 14 and 54, but it's still there and somewhat problematic. Here you are claiming that it didn't at all traumatize you while also arguing that pedophilia is perfectly fine.

Poe married his cousin when she was 13.

That same year, you could legally purchase another human being. Those two things being commonplace once upon a time doesn't make them any less fucked up.

Maybe she actually wanted to marry him?

I can't tell if you're still going on about Poe's cousin here or if you're talking about the child from the article, so I'll try to address both...

Little girls in America in the early 1800s didn't have a whole lot of options. They weren't allowed to go to college. They couldn't vote. Good paying jobs were out of the question. In the particular case of Virginia Clemm, her family was destitute. Poe paid the family off so they would allow the marriage, and he had to lie about her age on the marriage license. Not the greatest example if that's who you're talking about.

If you're talking about the child from the article, she definitely didn't want to marry him. The rapist threatened her and her family to get his way. Let's entertain the hypothetical though. Even if she did want to marry her rapist, it doesn't make it ok. 14-year-olds want absurd things all the time. Mine would drop out of middle school and play video games all day if I let him. Doesn't mean he understands the impact that decision would have on his life.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's funny how much you're willing to type out, assume, and misunderstand to avoid answering a question you don't like.

If you’re talking about the child from the article, she definitely didn’t want to marry him. The rapist threatened her and her family to get his way.

That's all you had to say.

[–] QBertReynolds 0 points 7 months ago

Maybe go back and read. I already said that. Quoted the article in fact.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)